MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
SURREY · 事项说明

15316 88 Avenue:128 户公寓与托儿中心

已收录议会记录: 至

1168766 B.C. Ltd. 在 15316 88 Avenue 提议六层、128 户公寓和 20 个名额的托儿中心,并申请规划及分区修改。2023 年两项关联条例获三读,未据此认定最终通过或开发许可已签发。

Surrey · 直接动议:1 场会议 · 1 条

地点、参与方与方案

15316 88 Avenue 的公司业主是 1168766 B.C. Ltd.,代理为 Ankenman Associates Architects Inc.。方案拟建六层、128 户公寓及 20 个名额的托儿中心,并将 OCP 土地用途由 Urban 改为 Multiple Residential、分区由 RF 改为 CD。

容积率原文差异

规划报告列 FAR 2.46(总地面积口径)和 2.79(净地面积口径);12 月 18 日听证用途说明写拟许 2.46,同份纪要的条例 21108 描述却写 2.26。原文数字不一致,不能选其中一个作为已核定的最终上限。

公听与议会阶段

12 月 4 日,Kooner 提议、Stutt 附议的 R23-2372 启动 OCP/分区修订及开发许可草拟。12 月 18 日公听收到支持信、反对信和现场关切;随后条例 21108、21109 分别经 R23-2583(Kooner/Bains)和 R23-2584(Kooner/Bose)完成三读。

官方材料对拟议容积率写有 2.46 和 2.26 两种数字;关联条例只核至三读。

决定如何推进

按会议查看原始决定

JSON ↗

提议、附议是程序角色;记名票依据官方纪要或结构化投票记录中明确列出的票态显示。

2023-12-04 · 1 条动议

2023-12-04 Surrey 市议会土地使用会议 →

2023-12-04RES.R23-2372
启动规划及分区修订、草拟开发许可 →
该条动议通过

提议:Councillor Kooner;附议:Councillor Stutt

R23-2372:Kooner 提议、Stutt 附议;启动规划及分区修订、草拟开发许可,动议通过。

官方英文动议与结果
It was Moved by Councillor Kooner Seconded by Councillor Stutt That: 1. A Bylaw be introduced to amend the Official Community Plan (OCP) Figure 3: General Land Use Designations for the subject site from "Urban" to "Multiple Residential", and a date for Public Hearing be set. 2. A Bylaw be introduced to amend OCP Table 7a: Land Use Designation Exceptions within the "Multiple Residential" designation by adding site specific permission for the subject site to permit a density up to 2.46 FAR, and a date for Public Hearing be set. 3. Council determine the opportunities for consultation with persons, organizations and authorities that are considered to be affected by the proposed amendment to the OCP, as described in the report, to be appropriate to meet the requirement of Section 475 of the Local Government Act. 4. A Bylaw be introduced to rezone the subject site from "Single Family Residential Zone (RF)" to "Comprehensive Development Zone (CD)", and a date be set for Public Hearing. 5. Council authorize staff to draft Development Permit No. 7922-0307-00 generally in accordance with the attached drawings (Appendix I). 6. Council instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to final adoption: (a) ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including restrictive covenants, dedications, and rights-of-way where necessary, are addressed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Engineering; (b) submission of a road dedication plan to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; (c) resolution of all urban design issues to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (d) submission of a finalized landscaping plan and landscaping cost estimate to the specifications and satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (e) submission of a finalized tree survey and a statement regarding tree preservation to the satisfaction of the City Landscape Architect; (f) the applicant satisfy the deficiency in tree replacement on the site, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (g) the applicant provide a density bonus amenity contribution consistent with the Tier 2 Capital Projects CACs in support of the Regular Council - Land Use Minutes December 4, 2023 Page 3 requested increased density, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning and Development Department; (h) demolition of existing buildings and structures to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (i) registration of a volumetric statutory right-of-way for public rights-of-passage over the proposed plaza located at the southern edge of the site as well as the north-south pedestrian walkway located along the east edge of the site; (j) submission of an acoustical report for the units adjacent to 88 Avenue and registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to ensure implementation of noise mitigation measures; (k) Registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to adequately address the City’s needs with respect to public art, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture and with respect to the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy and Tier 1 Capital Project CACs, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning & Development Services; and (l) registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to require the building to be constructed to zero carbon emissions, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department. RES.R23-2372 Carried