Wildwood Place 联排申请 · 启动规划修订与许可草拟

It was Moved by Councillor Kooner Seconded by Councillor Elford That: 1. a Bylaw be introduced to amend the Official Community Plan (OCP) Figure 3: General Land Use Designations (Appendix VII), for a portion of the subject site from "Suburban" to "Urban", and a date for Public Hearing be set. 2. Council determine the opportunities for consultation with persons, organizations and authorities that are considered to be affected by the proposed amendment to the OCP, as described in the Report, to be appropriate to meet the requirement of Section 475 of the Local Government Act. 3. a Bylaw be introduced to rezone the portion of the subject site as shown as Block B on the attached Survey Plan (Appendix I), from "General Agriculture Zone (A-1)" to "Comprehensive Development Zone (CD)", and a date be set for Public Hearing. 4. a Bylaw be introduced to rezone the portion of the subject site as shown as Block A on the attached Survey Plan (Appendix I), from "General Agriculture Zone (A-1)" to "Quarter Acre Residential Zone (R2)", and Block C on the attached Survey Plan from "General Agriculture Zone (A-1)" to "Urban Residential Zone (R3)" and a date be set for Public Hearing. 5. Council authorize staff to draft Development Permit No. 7921-0067-00 generally in accordance with the attached drawings (Appendix II). 6. Council instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to final adoption: (a) ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including restrictive covenants, dedications, and rights-of-way where necessary, are addressed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Engineering; Regular Council - Land Use Minutes November 4, 2024 Page 3 (b) submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; (c) resolution of all urban design issues to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (d) submission of a finalized landscaping plan and landscaping cost estimate to the specifications and satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (e) submission of a finalized tree survey and a statement regarding tree preservation to the satisfaction of the City Landscape Architect; (f) the applicant satisfy the deficiency in tree replacement on the site, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (g) the applicant provide a density bonus amenity contribution consistent with the Tier 2 Capital Projects CACs in support of the requested increased density, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning and Development Department; (h) provision of cash-in-lieu contribution to satisfy the indoor amenity space requirement of the RM-15 Zone, at the rate in effect at the time of Final Adoption; (i) demolition of existing buildings and structures to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (j) concurrent consolidation and subdivision of a portion of the subject site, shown as Block C on the attached Survey Plan (Appendix I), with 8422 - 170 Street, as part of Development Application No. 7923-0241-00; (k) registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to adequately address the City’s needs with respect to public art, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture and with respect to the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy and Tier 1 Capital Project CACs, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning & Development Department, for the proposed townhouse development; and (l) the applicant adequately address the City’s needs with respect to the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning & Development Department, for the proposed single-family development. Regular Council - Land Use Minutes November 4, 2024 Page 4 Before the question was put: It was Moved by Councillor Annis Seconded by Councillor Nagra That Application No. 7921-0067-00 be referred back to staff for the developer to conduct an additional public consultation with the residents. RES.R24-2335 Defeated With Mayor Locke and Councillors Elford, Hepner, Kooner and Stutt opposed. The question was then put on the motion that was previously being considered and the motion was passed. RES.R24-2336 Carried