City Council - November 14, 2022 - Minutes - City of Richmond, BC

The question on the motion was not called as discussion ensued with respect to (i) retention and relocation of the Herrling residence, and (ii) the requirements for establishing designated (protected) heritage status. Staff noted the Herrling residence is not on the heritage registry for protection, however the home and the location does have heritage value. As a result of the discussion, the following amendment motion was introduced: It was moved and seconded That that the Herrling house not be demolished and that it be mandatory that the house must be moved, preferably to a location in Richmond. The question on the amendment motion was not called as further discussion ensued with respect to the feasibility of relocating the Herrling house and location considerations within Richmond. Staff noted there was a preliminary assessment of the home, however a condition report has not been done therefore the structural integrity and any upgrades to standards, etc., is unknown. The question on the amendment motion was then called, and it was DEFEATED with Mayor Brodie and Cllrs. Heed, Hobbs, Loo and McNulty opposed. A further amendment motion was then introduced: R22/19-6 It was moved and seconded That, prior to Public Hearing, staff investigate with the applicant, the condition of the value of the Herrling residence and examine the potential for relocation in the city of Richmond. CARRIED The question on the motion, as amended, was then called and CARRIED with Cllrs. Day and Wolfe opposed.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道；仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构；不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗