City Council - June 7, 2023 - Minutes (Special) - City of Richmond, BC
这段原文取自本站留存的同一版来源资料,仅展示本条相关片段;在线来源可能更新。
SP23/3-1 It was moved and seconded
That the staff report titled “Steveston Highway Multi-Use Pathway Project Phases 1 and 2 – Update” be referred back to staff to bring back information on other routes and options to better connect our existing networks.
The question on the referral motion was not called as discussion took place on (i) waiting for further information on the George Massey Tunnel project, (ii) safety concerns of the multi-use pathway (MUP) on Steveston Highway, and (iii) moving ahead with the project.
The question on the referral motion was then called and it was DEFEATED with Mayor Brodie, Cllrs. Au, Gillanders, Hobbs, Loo, and Wolfe opposed.
SP23/3-2 It was moved and seconded
( 1 ) That Option 1 as described in the staff report titled “Steveston Highway Multi-Use Pathway Project Phases 1 and 2 – Update”, dated May 10, 2023, from the Director, Transportation and the Director, Engineering be approved; and
( 2 ) That the Consolidated 5 Year Financial Plan (2023-2027) be amended accordingly.
The question on the motion was not called as discussion took place on (i) the pros and cons of narrowing the road lanes, (ii) the buffer of grass and trees, (iii) not delaying the project any longer, (iii) maintenance of the grass and tree buffer, (iv) loss of vegetation and park space, (v) improving pathway connectivity in the City, and (vi) safety concerns.
Direction was given to staff to examine (i) upgrades to Williams Road and Dike Road, such as plastic bollards, and fresh painted lines, (ii) options to deal with increased traffic and speed on farm roads, (iii) options and costs for wooden bollards with reflectors on median and trees, and (iv) options for narrowing the median and adding a railing in some locations around significant trees to retain more trees.
The question on the motion was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Day, Heed, Hobbs and McNulty opposed.
非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗
打开原始来源 ↗版本与字符定位
留存文件 SHA-256:e9c3d4bbe3aaded183ce662b32404f0ecde43af7ebb2fb0af4426639c0e9b366
文本 SHA-256:74f3eb60f95302ad4dcec967bfed92d0f73cc213946ff56f062f00fda441af30
抽取:richmond-minutes-dom-blocks-v1
字符 7538–9445(末端不含)