MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
RICHMOND · 固定版本 · PDF 第 1 页

Staff Memorandum

这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。

Following the direction by City Council, the applicant’s arborist revisited the opportunities to retain some ofthe fruit/flowering trees on the subject property and it was determined that the original recommendations, as presented in the staff report, are validated for the following reasons: e The majority of the fruit/flowering trees are in poor to extremely poor condition (Trees # 711, 713, 715, 717, 724, 725, 745-750). © One Pink Flowering Dogwood tree (Tree # 736) is in good condition, however, it is in conflict with the proposed drive-aisle, which cannot be relocated due to traffic safety. The project arborist further assessed this tree and identified that the tree is not suitable for relocation due to its size and likelihood of success. The arborist’s recommendations are supported by the City’s Tree Preservation Coordinator. Staff note that there are risks and potential liability associated with compelling developers to retain trees that, in the opinion of the City’s Tree Protection Bylaw Staff and an independent accredited arborist, are not suitable for retention. On this basis, City staff recommends proceeding with the tree management strategy and terms as identified in the staff report to council from the Director, Development dated April 17, 2023, for the rezoning of 7371 No. 4 Road (RZ 20-919143).

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗

打开官方 PDF ↗
版本与字符定位

留存文件 SHA-256:1b4c2aec9ee472b9e84210e670e9a5204865a1b84eefb85ca13ee1abfed2a438

文本 SHA-256:0050c4bcdf8703387b985889c6e4748710c50cb4dbca748d2d63970259ace322

抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-native-footer-ocr150-eng-7d4322bd2a774972-v1
第 1–1 页;字符 685–2014(末端不含)