Surrey 2024-11-04 市议会土地使用会议
这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。
It was
Moved by Councillor Kooner
Seconded by Councillor Elford
That:
1.
a Bylaw be introduced to amend the Official Community Plan (OCP)
Figure 3: General Land Use Designations (Appendix VII), for a portion
of the subject site from "Suburban" to "Urban", and a date for
Public Hearing be set.
2.
Council determine the opportunities for consultation with persons,
organizations and authorities that are considered to be affected by the
proposed amendment to the OCP, as described in the Report, to be
appropriate to meet the requirement of Section 475 of the
Local Government Act.
3.
a Bylaw be introduced to rezone the portion of the subject site as shown
as Block B on the attached Survey Plan (Appendix I), from
"General Agriculture Zone (A-1)" to "Comprehensive Development Zone
(CD)", and a date be set for Public Hearing.
4.
a Bylaw be introduced to rezone the portion of the subject site as shown as
Block A on the attached Survey Plan (Appendix I), from "General
Agriculture Zone (A-1)" to "Quarter Acre Residential Zone (R2)", and
Block C on the attached Survey Plan from "General Agriculture Zone (A-1)"
to "Urban Residential Zone (R3)" and a date be set for Public Hearing.
5.
Council authorize staff to draft Development Permit No. 7921-0067-00
generally in accordance with the attached drawings (Appendix II).
6.
Council instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to final adoption:
(a)
ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including
restrictive covenants, dedications, and rights-of-way where necessary,
are addressed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Engineering;
Regular Council - Land Use Minutes
November 4, 2024
Page 3
(b)
submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the
Approving Officer;
(c)
resolution of all urban design issues to the satisfaction of the
Planning and Development Department;
(d)
submission of a finalized landscaping plan and landscaping cost
estimate to the specifications and satisfaction of the Planning and
Development Department;
(e)
submission of a finalized tree survey and a statement regarding tree
preservation to the satisfaction of the City Landscape Architect;
(f)
the applicant satisfy the deficiency in tree replacement on the site,
to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department;
(g)
the applicant provide a density bonus amenity contribution
consistent with the Tier 2 Capital Projects CACs in support of
the requested increased density, to the satisfaction of the
General Manager, Planning and Development Department;
(h)
provision of cash-in-lieu contribution to satisfy the indoor amenity
space requirement of the RM-15 Zone, at the rate in effect at the
time of Final Adoption;
(i)
demolition of existing buildings and structures to the satisfaction of
the Planning and Development Department;
(j)
concurrent consolidation and subdivision of a portion of the
subject site, shown as Block C on the attached Survey Plan
(Appendix I), with 8422 - 170 Street, as part of Development
Application No. 7923-0241-00;
(k)
registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to adequately
address the City’s needs with respect to public art, to the
satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture
and with respect to the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy and
Tier 1 Capital Project CACs, to the satisfaction of the
General Manager, Planning & Development Department, for the
proposed townhouse development; and
(l)
the applicant adequately address the City’s needs with respect to
the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy, to the satisfaction of the
General Manager, Planning & Development Department, for the
proposed single-family development.
Regular Council - Land Use Minutes
November 4, 2024
Page 4
Before the question was put:
It was
Moved by Councillor Annis
Seconded by Councillor Nagra
That Application No. 7921-0067-00 be
referred back to staff for the developer to conduct an additional public
consultation with the residents.
RES.R24-2335
Defeated
With Mayor Locke and Councillors Elford,
Hepner, Kooner and Stutt opposed.
The question was then put on the motion that was previously being considered
and the motion was passed.
RES.R24-2336
Carried
非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗
打开官方 PDF ↗版本与字符定位
留存文件 SHA-256:e6570b22d02b18fa6ce785c77cbe08892aa28d55dfb1e3ce5b274c5fa2423caa
文本 SHA-256:2e7cdcccb2968caefcb73f0ff16fdf62029e7d74e4876695a3ccb67ecbff80b6
抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 2–4 页;字符 2134–6501(末端不含)