Surrey PLR_7923-0337-00.pdf

Board of Variance - Minutes September 12, 2018 seeking the maximum extension request. City staff have expressed support for the proposal. Should an extension of the Land Use Contract (LUC) not be permitted, the Appellant would be forced to abandon Phase Two of the construction process, resulting in loss of time and funds already invested into the project. Additionally, there would be a hardship to the community, as the project would not result in additional rental stock. In response to questions from the Board, the Agent made the following comments: • The project would result in an additional 50 rental units. The Chair confirmed there were no persons present to speak to the application and no correspondence received in response to the notification regarding the appeal. Members of the Board made the following comments regarding the requested variance: • The property was purchased and the construction process initiated prior to the termination of the LUC. The proposal would be permitted under the LUC. • The Appellant has invested time and funding into the project and the termination of the LUC would result in a hardship. • The proposal would provide a benefit to the community by adding additional rental stock in the area. Therefore, it was Moved by P. Sandhar Seconded by I. Dhillon THAT the Board finds that undue hardship would be caused to the Appellant by the early termination of Land Use Contract No. 420, and orders that Appeal No. 18-61, to extend the effective termination date of the Land Use Contract until January 8, 2024, to allow for the conversion of some of the retail space into residential units at 9801 and 9835 King George Boulevard, as presented to the Board, be ALLOWED. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY D. OTHER BUSINESS h:\clerks\council boards and commissionslboard of variancelminutes\2018\min bov 2018 09 12.docx Page2

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道；仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构；不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗