Development Cost Charges Imposition Bylaw No. 9499, Amendment Bylaw No. 10732
这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。
Analysis and Recommendation
A per dwelling unit methodology has a stronger relationship to the number of households
created, while a per square foot methodology better reflects the overall scale of development and
avoids creating a pricing structure that may inadvertently discourage the delivery of smaller and
more attainable missing middle housing forms. Both approaches have merits and limitations, and
neither provides a perfect proxy for infrastructure demand in every circumstance.
非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗
打开官方 PDF ↗版本与字符定位
留存文件 SHA-256:1e369b4735f5919a722d050fb51d01278e0cdc4b061d77d233f242e75abb8f42
文本 SHA-256:518def29230315adf319995ab76425b61b8d2778121baedac14ca1e95ef786ed
抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 4–4 页;字符 7563–8056(末端不含)