MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
SURREY · 事项说明

88 Avenue:两栋商业楼与托儿设施提案

已收录议会记录: 至

七处门牌拟建两栋商业楼,含托儿及看护人单元;分区条例已三读,偏差许可尚待最终通过等条件。

Surrey · 直接动议:1 场会议 · 1 条

地点与方案

申请涉及 13135/13143/13145/13153/13169/13175/13187 号 88 Avenue。公司业主为 1187304 B.C. Ltd.,纪要列代理 R. Warraich;拟把 R3 住宅分区改为 C-5 邻里商业分区,兴建两栋零售/商业楼,含托儿及看护人单元、地面停车。纪要未列托儿名额。

许可拟改什么

R26-943 由 Hepner/Stutt 提议附议通过:启动分区和听证、授权起草 DP,DVP 先进入公众通知。拟议偏差把 A 类溪流退距由 30 米减至 7.7 米,南侧/东侧退距由 7.5 米减至 3 米,楼高上限由 9 米升至 10 米;仍须处理生态缓解计划等最终批准前条件。

听证与后续决定

2026 年 5 月 11 日本项听证中,Surrey Environmental Partners 的代表提出河岸、鱼类栖息地、生物多样性及树木补偿等担忧,另有一份支持意见。条例 22026 随后由 Kooner/Bains 提议附议通过三读;Stutt/Kooner 的 R26-1119 仅支持 DVP,并把考虑签发系于相关分区条例最终通过。固定会议包未见最终通过。

三读和对 DVP 的支持都不等于条例最终通过或许可签发。

决定如何推进

按会议查看原始决定

JSON ↗

提议、附议是程序角色;记名票依据官方纪要或结构化投票记录中明确列出的票态显示。

2026-04-27 · 1 条动议

2026-04-27 Surrey 市议会土地使用会议 →

2026-04-27RES.R26-943
88 Avenue 商业及托儿提案:启动分区与许可程序 →
该条动议通过

提议:Councillor Hepner;附议:Councillor Stutt

Hepner 提议、Stutt 附议的 R26-943 通过:推进 R3→C-5 分区和公开听证,授权起草 DP;DVP 进入公众通知及后续表态程序,并未签发。

官方英文动议与结果
It was Moved by Councillor Hepner Seconded by Councillor Stutt That: 1. a Bylaw be introduced to rezone the subject site from Urban Residential Zone (R3) to Neighbourhood Commercial Zone (C-5), and a date be set for Public Hearing. 2. Council authorize staff to draft Development Permit No. 7917-0602-00 generally in accordance with the attached drawings (Appendix A). 3. Council endorse Development Variance Permit No. 7917-0602-00, varying the following in the Zoning By-law, to proceed to Public Notification and bring the Development Variance Permit forward for an indication of support by Council. If supported, the Development Variance Permit will be brought forward for issuance and execution by the Mayor and City Clerk in conjunction with the final adoption of the associated rezoning bylaw. (a) in Section B.1 Streamside Setback Areas of Part 7A Streamside Protection, reduce the minimum setback distance for a Class A stream from 30 metres to 7.7 metres as measured from the top of bank; (b) in Section F. "Yards and Setbacks" of Part 35 Neighbourhood Commercial Zone (C-5), reduce side yard (south) and front yard (east) setbacks from 7.5 metres to 3 metres; and (c) in Section G. "Height of Buildings" of Part 35 Neighbourhood Commercial Zone (C-5), increase the maximum building height allowed from 9 metres to 10 metres. 4. Council instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to final approval: (a) resolution of all engineering requirements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Engineering (Appendix C); (b) submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; (c) submission and acceptance of finalized architectural drawings, including resolution of all urban design issues, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (d) submission and acceptance of finalized landscaping drawings, including resolution of all landscape design issues, compliance with the landscaping and screening requirements of the C-5 Zone, and a Regular Council - Land Use Minutes April 27, 2026 Page 12 landscaping cost estimate to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (e) submission and acceptance of a finalized arborist report, including satisfying the required tree replacement, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (f) submission and acceptance of a finalized Ecosystem Development Plan and Impact Mitigation Plan to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (g) submission and acceptance of a finalized Geotechnical Report to the satisfaction of City staff; (h) demolition of existing buildings and structures to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (i) registration of a statutory right-of-way for public rights-of-passage for the publicly accessible open space (corner plaza) within the site and walkway between buildings; and (j) registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to adequately address the City’s needs with respect to public art, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture and with respect to the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy and Tier 1 Capital Project CACs, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning & Development. RES.R26-943 Carried