Surrey 2024-05-27 市议会公开听证会议
这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。
Regular Council – Public Hearing Minutes
May 27, 2024
Page 3
B.
DELEGATIONS - PUBLIC HEARING
1.
Planning Report - Application No. 7921-0290-00
"Surrey Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2013, No. 18020, Amendment
Bylaw, 2024, No. 21262"
"Surrey Comprehensive Development Zone 208 (CD 208), Bylaw, 2024,
No. 21263"
CIVIC ADDRESS:
2160 King George Boulevard
APPLICANT:
Owner: Diyash Property Investments Inc.
(Director Information: B. Dharni, J. Sharma, A. Sharma)
Agent: Flat Architecture Inc. (Rajinder Warraich)
PURPOSE:
The applicant is requesting to amend the Official
Community Plan (OCP) Figure 3: General Land Use
Designations to redesignate the site from Urban to
Commercial. The proposal also includes rezoning the same
site from Tourist Accommodation Zone to Comprehensive
Development Zone in order to develop a 4-storey, 80-room
hotel with a restaurant.
The Notice of the Public Hearing was read by the City Clerk.
•
D. Jack, Surrey Environmental Partners: The delegation expressed concern
for the proposal citing tree retention, biodiversity, and a planted flat roof.
•
J. Starling, Surrey Centre: The delegation provided comments not related
to the bylaw being considered at the public hearing and their speaking
opportunity ended.
•
E. Luba: The delegation provided comments not related to the bylaw being
considered at the public hearing and their speaking opportunity ended.
•
K. Kaur, Newton: The delegation provided comments not related to the
bylaw being considered at the public hearing and their speaking
opportunity ended.
•
S. Naguib, Newton: The delegation provided comments not related to the
bylaw being considered at the public hearing and their speaking
opportunity ended.
Written submissions were received as follows:
•
G. Johnson expressing support for the proposal.
•
R. Landale expressing opposition for the proposal citing trees.
•
E. Thorpe expressing opposition for the proposal citing need for permanent
housing instead of a hotel.
•
S. Esligar expressing opposition for the proposal citing quality of life.
非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗
打开官方 PDF ↗版本与字符定位
留存文件 SHA-256:df099b54ed64c81ce9a5d7cec19efd7119a4542a8f3f4907f726479f44255017
文本 SHA-256:3c1342d8aa1ef5ea0b67827605e086a6fb9073d1b213f02d14a555ddfbdf1381
抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 3–3 页;字符 2777–4903(末端不含)