Public Hearing - June 19, 2023 – Minutes - City of Richmond, BC

In response to queries from Council, staff noted: § as per the recommendations of the applicant’s geotechnical review, the retaining wall would remain in place with the fence as constructed above and the grade of the property being matched with the property to the east; § with respect to ensuring the integrity of the neighbouring property, as part of the Building Permit application the applicant will be required to submit a thorough geotechnical study. Also, as noted in the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant, monitoring the undertaking during construction is recommended, which would include installing monitoring equipment on the retaining wall itself. The applicant has also made an offer to place such equipment on the neighbouring property as well, subject to getting the neighbouring properties authorization; § the existing hedges on-site are is not recommended for retention. Also, the area occupied by the existing hedges would be used to access the secondary suite on the property; § a damage deposit is not required for the adjacent property as part of the applicant’s undertaking for construction on the subject property; and § for the purposes of the subject property, Dixon Road is considered the front yard, the east property line is a side yard, as such, any new construction on the property could be placed 1.2m from the property line, consistent with the rezoning application. The question on the motion was then called and it was CARRIED.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道；仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构；不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗