MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
SURREY · 固定版本 · PDF 第 8 页

Surrey 2023-12-04 市议会公开听证会议

这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。

Regular Council - Public Hearing Minutes December 4, 2023 Page 8 D. Jack, Surrey Environmental Partners: The delegation spoke to biodiversity conservation. There were no written submissions received to the proposed Bylaw. Councillor Annis declared a conflict of interest and left the meeting at 8:28 p.m. 6. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No. 12000, Text Amendment Bylaw, 2023, No. 21085" 3900-20-21085 – Regulatory Text Amendment PURPOSE: A Bylaw to amend Part 52 and add a new Schedule K of the Surrey Zoning Bylaw 12000 to support the inclusion of one secondary suite in existing Comprehensive Development Zones that regulate single family dwellings and that have adequate lot size, width and depth to provide at least three off-street parking spaces, as described in the Corporate Report 2020-R162. The Notice of the Public Hearing was read by the City Clerk. D. Jack, Surrey Environmental Partners: The delegation expressed concern regarding changes to legislation by the Province, biodiversity conservation, and riparian areas. Written submissions were received as follows: • D. Helman expressing support for the proposal citing more housing is needed. • P. Binning expressing support for the proposal. • R. Giardini expressing opposition for the proposal citing single family neighbourhood, destroy front lawns, small lots, parking problems and concerns about runoff. • G. Sutton expressing opposition for the proposal citing homes and community were not planned to allow secondary suites, peaceful neighbourhood, multiple families, multiple cars on the street and character of neighbourhood. • B. Glendinning expressing opposition for the proposal citing more vehicles parked on the street, street racing, illegal suites, pedestrian safety and traffic. • S. Ives expressing opposition for the proposal citing increased density, noise, loss of privacy, and additional traffic. • J. Chursinow and T. Chursinow expressing opposition for the proposal citing busy neighbourhood. • N. Fujikawa and R. Fujikawa expressing opposition for the proposal citing overcrowding of schools, overcrowding in hospitals and medical facilities, shortage of doctors and nurses, vehicle parking, no private parking, illegal suites and density. • K. Wakelin expressing concerns for the proposal citing enforcement of parking and no visitor street parking. • J. Savage expressing concerns for the proposal. • B. Sekhon expressing concerns for the proposal citing illegal suites and how will City monitor them.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗

打开官方 PDF ↗
版本与字符定位

留存文件 SHA-256:fc3772758483069e56557402d7a809ec8bcbca4cd724d23c108c3187ad25db3d

文本 SHA-256:022437e161ddb869546d55156ad7745d93938145f12b61f39f50b87868c33a96

抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 8–8 页;字符 14349–16926(末端不含)