Surrey 7923-0072-00 May 1 2023 TUP planning report

Staff Report to Council Application No.: 7923-0072-00 Planning & Development Report Page 7 from the top of bank. The proposed setback complies with the requirements outlined in the Zoning By-law.  The subject property falls within the Sensitive Ecosystems Development Permit Area (DPA) for Streamside Areas in the OCP, given the location of the existing Class B (yellow-coded) watercourse which flows within the ditch to the south of the site. The Sensitive Ecosystems (Streamside Areas) Development Permit is required to protect aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems associated with streams from the impacts of development.  The Ecosystem Development Plan is a condition of the issuance of the Temporary Use Permit. The finalized report and recommendations will be considered by Council in a subsequent report as part of a separate Development Permit for a Sensitive Ecosystems application. POLICY & BY-LAW CONSIDERATIONS Official Community Plan Land Use Designation  The subject site is designated as "Mixed Employment" in the OCP. The proposed interim use complies with the OCP designation, which accommodates light industrial uses. Secondary Plans Land Use Designation  The subject site is designated “Industrial Business Park” in the Anniedale-Tynehead Neighbourhood Concept Plan (NCP). The Industrial Business Park designation is intended for manufacturing, processing, warehousing, and distribution of goods in conjunction with Low- rise office and professional office park development.  The proposed temporary use is considered to be supportable as it will allow an authorized, interim use of the land until it is economically viable for redevelopment in accordance with the Anniedale-Tynehead NCP.  In addition, the temporary use will assist in providing much-needed authorized truck parking spaces and outdoor storage in the City. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT  Pre-notification letters were sent on March 15, 2023, and the Development Proposal Signs were installed on March 20, 2023. Staff received four responses from neighbours opposed (staff comments in italics) as well as one letter in support: o The area is rural and suburban and not suitable for trucks to wind through the neighbourhood. The portion of 92 Avenue fronting the site and to the east is too narrow for trucks to operate safely.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道；仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构；不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗