MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
RICHMOND · 固定版本 · PDF 第 4 页

Response to Provincial Housing Bills: Density Bonus and Inclusionary Zoning Requirements and Associated Zoning Bylaw Amendments

这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。

Proposed Response to Bill 16 The purpose of the proposed zoning bylaw amendments outlined in this report is to meet the Province’s June 30, 2026 deadline to bring the City’s existing standard residential and mixed-use zones into compliance with the Local Government Act as amended by Bill 16. Since adoption of Richmond’s Affordable Housing Strategy (AHS) in 2007 and City Centre Area Plan (CCAP) in 2009, the City has made extensive use of the density bonus tool, as per the Local Government Act, to secure affordable housing and amenities. Maintaining the density bonus provisions in existing standard zones would not comply with the Local Government Act and risks action by the Province. Alternatively, amending all standard zones to retain density bonus or incorporate inclusionary zoning (as required within TOA) would be premature given the proposed review of the current affordable housing requirements. As a result, a strategic approach is recommended involving removing density bonus provisions from all existing standard residential and mixed- use zones, except for SSMUH standard zones, and not incorporating inclusionary zoning in existing standard zones at this time. With the exception of SSMUH standard zones, the affected standard zones generally permit lower densities than those contemplated in the City’s updated Official Community Plan (OCP) and therefore are unlikely to be used for future redevelopment. The recommended approach protects existing and approved developments from non-conformity through site-specific density provisions, and previously secured affordable housing and amenity contributions remain protected through existing legal agreements registered on title. In addition, the recommended approach preserves the City’s ability to continue securing affordable housing and amenity contributions through site-specific rezoning. The proposed approach is summarized below according to five building types and described in further detail in Attachments 2 to 6.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗

打开官方 PDF ↗
版本与字符定位

留存文件 SHA-256:6b916305f9e9764c60f34e6485518f251357f17fb73f63d0d62817d894d19bd1

文本 SHA-256:970d18015a6ed47c28fccda243815b6c227909fe88817486a438ff31e10590ae

抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 4–4 页;字符 10156–12168(末端不含)