MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
RICHMOND · 固定版本 · PDF 第 4 页

Proposed Development Cost Charges Program and Amenity Cost Charges Program

这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。

Option 2 - Prioritized Implementation of DCC Update (Recommended) This option takes a prioritization approach by defeITing the implementation of the new categories of DCC under Bill 46, delaying projects of lower priority, and adjusting the costs of the DCC programs by only the consumer price index adjustment of 2% to 3% per year. With the defe1Ted implementation of the new DCC categories, any growth-related portion of the capital costs of eligible facilities will continue to be borne by existing population (through municipal fees or reserves) until the new DCC rates are established in the future. The use of general inflation to adjust the program costs, while it can help keep the DCC rates at a level that is in line with general inflation, could lead to the shifting of the costs of growth to existing population or future developments.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗

打开官方 PDF ↗
版本与字符定位

留存文件 SHA-256:bb154dc79fe85d6e3f6658960194ea8ad27c61748966d840ea49e4605d65aafe

文本 SHA-256:732dbfdce0e65201fc0d9444513d4dff964ddbacccab79ebe049186b75d4baa5

抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 4–4 页;字符 7923–8779(末端不含)