Surrey planning report 7922-0173-00

Staff Report to Council Application No.: 7922-0173-00 Planning & Development Report Page 6 Engineering: The Engineering Department has no objection to the project subject to the registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant prohibiting the addition of a secondary suite as a condition of support for the off-street parking variance. Parks, Recreation & Culture: Fun Fun Park is the closest park with active amenities, which includes a playground and bike park. The park is 900 metres walking distance from the development. 131E Greenbelt is the closest parkland with natural area and is 80 metres walking distance from the development. POLICY & BY-LAW CONSIDERATIONS Zoning By-law Setback/Parking  The applicant is requesting the following variances to the Zoning By-law, 1993, No. 12000: o In Section F. of Part 16 “Single Family Residential Zone”, the minimum front yard setback as measured from the face of a principal building is reduced from 7.5 metres to 0.5 metres; and o In Section H.1. of Part 16 “Single Family Residential Zone”, the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces is reduced from 3 to 2.  The proposed second storey addition will not result in a floor area that exceeds the maximum permitted under the “Single Family Residential Zone (RF)”.  No addition to the existing dwelling is possible without relaxation of the front yard setback for the existing dwelling. The proposal does not propose bringing the existing dwelling any closer to the front lot line and does not propose removing any existing parking.  The addition of a second storey over the existing building footprint conforms with the Development Permit guidelines in the OCP for Hazard Lands (Steep Slopes) by clustering additional building away from the steep portion of the site.  Staff support the requested variances to proceed for consideration. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT  Public notification letters were sent on June 6, 2023. Staff received three (3) responses from neighbouring residents. One respondent requested more information and two respondents objected to the proposal.  Residents’ comments are summarized below with staff comments in italics.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道；仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构；不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗