City Council - May 11, 2026 - Minutes - City of Richmond, BC
这段原文取自本站留存的同一版来源资料,仅展示本条相关片段;在线来源可能更新。
R26/9-5 It was moved and seconded
That the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) designation in the outlined areas (privately owned properties between Thompson and Boundary Roads, and south of Thompson Gate in the Hamilton area) be rescinded effective immediately.
The question on the motion was not called as discussion ensued with respect to (i) ESAs on privately owned properties, (ii) ESA designation as a result of an overgrown yard, (iii) development being limited by costs, (iv) specific areas being designated ESA, (v) consideration of habitat species at risk, (vi) ESA assessment and compensation, (vii) the existence of ESAs not necessarily stopping development but does increase costs to developers, and (viii) varying the time of year for site visits to capture all native plants in season.
In response to queries from Council, staff noted (i) a full review of ESAs, including the potential of removing ESAs on other lands, is underway and includes several site visits, (ii) the act of clearing land for farming is an exception for an ESA to be removed through the ESA exemption process, (iii) within the OCP the subject area allows for redevelopment for townhouses, and (iv) there have been ESA designation maps since the 1990s, however the larger ESA map that includes the subject ESA designation area would have been part of the 2012 OCP update, for which there would have been public consultation.
The question on Resolution R26/9-5 was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Gillanders and Wolfe opposed.
非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗
打开原始来源 ↗版本与字符定位
留存文件 SHA-256:af2ad6e1fd83019d778688e75787c88e1b6511be851c3444c17aad01f469606f
文本 SHA-256:b19a6d648d6123c3a1be7c8cf4e99ed288dd44dd0a542a5385740c7e5b12b8b6
抽取:richmond-minutes-dom-blocks-v1
字符 13730–15255(末端不含)