Surrey 2024-04-22 市议会土地使用会议

Regular Council - Land Use Minutes April 22, 2024 Page 20 (h) to reduce the minimum east front yard setback of the RM-30 Zone from 4.5 metres to 4.0 metres to the principal building face for Buildings 1 and 2. 5. Council instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to final adoption: (a) ensure that all engineering requirements and issues including restrictive covenants, dedications, and rights-of-way where necessary, are addressed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Engineering; (b) submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; (c) resolution of all urban design issues to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (d) submission of a finalized landscaping plan and landscaping cost estimate to the specifications and satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (e) submission of a finalized tree survey and a statement regarding tree preservation to the satisfaction of the City Landscape Architect; (f) the applicant satisfy the deficiency in tree replacement on the site, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (g) the applicant provide a density bonus amenity contribution consistent with the Tier 2 Capital Projects CACs in support of the requested increased density, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning and Development Department; (h) provision of cash-in-lieu contribution to satisfy the indoor amenity space requirement of the RM-30 Zone, at the rate in effect at the time of Final Adoption; (i) demolition of existing buildings and structures to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department; (j) registration of a right-of-way for public rights-of-passage for the multi-use pathway; (k) registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to specifically identify the allowable tandem parking arrangement and to prohibit the conversion of the tandem parking spaces into livable space; and (l) Registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant to adequately address the City’s needs with respect to public art, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Recreation and Culture and with respect to the City’s Affordable Housing Strategy and Tier 1 Capital Project CACs, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning & Development Department.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道；仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构；不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗