MetroVote 简体中文
公开试运行资料持续补充 · 名单日期见各选举页查看范围 ↗
SURREY · 固定版本 · PDF 第 3 页

Surrey 2023-03-06 市议会公开听证会议

这段原文取自本站留存的同一份 PDF,仅展示本条相关文本;官方在线版本可能更新。

Regular Council - Public Hearing Minutes March 6, 2023 Page 3 PURPOSE: The applicant is requesting to amend the Official Community Plan Figure 3: General Land Use Designations from Agricultural to Industrial; Figure 42: Major Employment Areas by adding the Industrial designation; Figure 43: Agricultural Lands by removing the Agricultural designation; Figure 51: Regional Growth Strategy Land Use Designations from Agricultural to Industrial; Figure 67: Green Infrastructure Development Permit Area by moving the ALR boundary east of the subject site; and Figure 69: Farming Protection Development Permit Area by moving the ALR Boundary east of the subject site and moving the Farming Protection Area east. In addition, the proposal includes discharging Land Use Contract No. 584 and rezoning the subject site from Light Impact Industrial Zone to Comprehensive Development Zone in order to develop a multi-tenant industrial building, with a restaurant and a volleyball facility. The Notice of the Public Hearing was read by the City Clerk. R. Landale, Fleetwood: The delegation spoke to traffic, tree removal and lack of Green City fund contributions. C. Rollins, Surrey: The delegation spoke to the removal of agricultural land. A. Vick, Sullivan: The delegation spoke to sidewalks and multiuse path, the proposed zoning, future use of agricultural land in the area, and expressed concerns regarding the loss of agricultural land and proposed zoning, lack of buffer between the subject site and park, and transportation. J. Chorney, Whalley: The delegation spoke in opposition to the proposal citing wildlife impacts, corruption and building vacancies. Resident: The delegation spoke to the removal of agricultural land. M. Kompter, Hub Engineering (Agent on behalf of the Applicant): The Agent provided an overview of the proposal and spoke to the proposed zoning, construction of sidewalks, site access, road widening, and landscaping and buffer. R. Dhall, Architecture Panel Inc. (Architect on behalf of the Applicant): The Architect provided an overview of the proposal and spoke to site context. Written submissions were received as follows: • Email from R. Landale dated March 6, 2023 in opposition citing traffic, public safety and trees. The meeting was recessed from 7:20 p.m. – 7:21 p.m.

非商业公共资料研究与事实报道;仅展示核对事实所需的已评估摘录及本站中文说明。版权归原作者或发布机构;不表示来源机构认可本站。原文、来源及使用条款见链接。 来源使用条款 ↗

打开官方 PDF ↗
版本与字符定位

留存文件 SHA-256:e71295eb2709286c8d529ec8dce2ed71526013d1c8260d014a4a04c820ff124e

文本 SHA-256:19f1816b0a41c8ad33337fbbfd741460cf8adfb82d7ded9d3e1f17aae7f4a522

抽取:pymupdf-1.26.7-text-pages-v1
第 3–3 页;字符 2968–5349(末端不含)